The existing implementation for {G,S}etSockOpt take arguments of an
empty interface type which all types (implicitly) implement; any
type may be passed to the functions.
This change introduces marker interfaces for socket options that may be
set or queried which socket option types implement to ensure that invalid
types are caught at compile time. Different interfaces are used to allow
the compiler to enforce read-only or set-only socket options.
Fixes#3714.
RELNOTES: n/a
PiperOrigin-RevId: 328832161
Formerly, when a packet is constructed or parsed, all headers are set by the
client code. This almost always involved prepending to pk.Header buffer or
trimming pk.Data portion. This is known to prone to bugs, due to the complexity
and number of the invariants assumed across netstack to maintain.
In the new PacketHeader API, client will call Push()/Consume() method to
construct/parse an outgoing/incoming packet. All invariants, such as slicing
and trimming, are maintained by the API itself.
NewPacketBuffer() is introduced to create new PacketBuffer. Zero value is no
longer valid.
PacketBuffer now assumes the packet is a concatenation of following portions:
* LinkHeader
* NetworkHeader
* TransportHeader
* Data
Any of them could be empty, or zero-length.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 326507688
On UDP sockets, SO_REUSEADDR allows multiple sockets to bind to the same
address, but only delivers packets to the most recently bound socket. This
differs from the behavior of SO_REUSEADDR on TCP sockets. SO_REUSEADDR for TCP
sockets will likely need an almost completely independent implementation.
SO_REUSEADDR has some odd interactions with the similar SO_REUSEPORT. These
interactions are tested fairly extensively and all but one particularly odd
one (that honestly seems like a bug) behave the same on gVisor and Linux.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 315844832
Historically we've been passing PacketBuffer by shallow copying through out
the stack. Right now, this is only correct as the caller would not use
PacketBuffer after passing into the next layer in netstack.
With new buffer management effort in gVisor/netstack, PacketBuffer will
own a Buffer (to be added). Internally, both PacketBuffer and Buffer may
have pointers and shallow copying shouldn't be used.
Updates #2404.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 314610879
This is a precursor to be being able to build an intrusive list
of PacketBuffers for use in queuing disciplines being implemented.
Updates #2214
PiperOrigin-RevId: 302677662
Ghanan Gowripalan
Ting-Yu Wang
Ian Gudger
Andrei Vagin
Jay Zhuang
Bhasker Hariharan
Tamir Duberstein
Eyal Soha
Bert Muthalaly
Kevin Krakauer
gVisor bot