Because the abi will depend on the core types for marshalling (usermem,
context, safemem, safecopy), these need to be flattened from the sentry
directory. These packages contain no sentry-specific details.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 291811289
Currently, the overlay dirCache is only used for a single logical use of
getdents. i.e., it is discard when the FD is closed or seeked back to
the beginning.
But the initial work of getting the directory contents can be quite
expensive (particularly sorting large directories), so we should keep it
as long as possible.
This is very similar to the readdirCache in fs/gofer.
Since the upper filesystem does not have to allow caching readdir
entries, the new CacheReaddir MountSourceOperations method controls this
behavior.
This caching should be trivially movable to all Inodes if desired,
though that adds an additional copy step for non-overlay Inodes.
(Overlay Inodes already do the extra copy).
PiperOrigin-RevId: 255477592
Separate MountSource from Mount. This is needed to allow
mounts to be shared by multiple containers within the same
pod.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 249617810
Change-Id: Id2944feb7e4194951f355cbe6d4944ae3c02e468
There is a lot of redundancy that we can simplify in the stat_times
test. This will make it easier to add new tests. However, the
simplification reveals that cached uattrs on goferfs don't properly
update ctime on rename.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 248773425
Change-Id: I52662728e1e9920981555881f9a85f9ce04041cf
Based on the guidelines at
https://opensource.google.com/docs/releasing/authors/.
1. $ rg -l "Google LLC" | xargs sed -i 's/Google LLC.*/The gVisor Authors./'
2. Manual fixup of "Google Inc" references.
3. Add AUTHORS file. Authors may request to be added to this file.
4. Point netstack AUTHORS to gVisor AUTHORS. Drop CONTRIBUTORS.
Fixes#209
PiperOrigin-RevId: 245823212
Change-Id: I64530b24ad021a7d683137459cafc510f5ee1de9
In the case of a rename replacing an existing destination inode, ramfs
Rename failed to first remove the replaced inode. This caused:
1. A leak of a reference to the inode (making it live indefinitely).
2. For directories, a leak of the replaced directory's .. link to the
parent. This would cause the parent's link count to incorrectly
increase.
(2) is much simpler to test than (1), so that's what I've done.
agentfs has a similar bug with link count only, so the Dirent layer
informs the Inode if this is a replacing rename.
Fixes#133
PiperOrigin-RevId: 239105698
Change-Id: I4450af2462d8ae3339def812287213d2cbeebde0
More helper structs have been added to the fsutil package to make it easier to
implement fs.InodeOperations and fs.FileOperations.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 229305982
Change-Id: Ib6f8d3862f4216745116857913dbfa351530223b
When revalidating a Dirent, if the inode id is the same, then we don't need to
throw away the entire Dirent. We can just update the unstable attributes in
place.
If the inode id has changed, then the remote file has been deleted or moved,
and we have no choice but to throw away the dirent we have a look up another.
In this case, we may still end up losing a mounted dirent that is a child of
the revalidated dirent. However, that seems appropriate here because the entire
mount point has been pulled out from underneath us.
Because gVisor's overlay is at the Inode level rather than the Dirent level, we
must pass the parent Inode and name along with the Inode that is being
revalidated.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 210431270
Change-Id: I705caef9c68900234972d5aac4ae3a78c61c7d42
Previously, an overlay would panic if either the upper or lower fs required
revalidation for a given Dirent. Now, we allow revalidation from the upper
file, but not the lower.
If a cached overlay inode does need revalidation (because the upper needs
revalidation), then the entire overlay Inode will be discarded and a new
overlay Inode will be built with a fresh copy of the upper file.
As a side effect of this change, Revalidate must take an Inode instead of a
Dirent, since an overlay needs to revalidate individual Inodes.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 208293638
Change-Id: Ic8f8d1ffdc09114721745661a09522b54420c5f1
The current revalidation logic is very simple and does not do much
introspection of the dirent being revalidated (other than looking at the type
of file).
Fancier revalidation logic is coming soon, and we need to be able to look at
the cached and uncached attributes of a given dirent, and we need a context to
perform some of these operations.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 205307351
Change-Id: If17ea1c631d8f9489c0e05a263e23d7a8a3bf159
Adin Scannell
Michael Pratt
Ian Gudger
Fabricio Voznika
Nicolas Lacasse
Googler