128948d6ae
This is required to test filesystems with a non-trivial implementation of FilesystemImpl.Release(). Propagation isn't handled yet, and umount isn't yet plumbed out to VirtualFilesystem.UmountAt(), but otherwise the implementation of umount is believed to be correct. - Move entering mountTable.seq writer critical sections to callers of mountTable.{insert,remove}Seqed. This is required since umount(2) must ensure that no new references are taken on the candidate mount after checking that it isn't busy, which is only possible by entering a vfs.mountTable.seq writer critical section before the check and remaining in it until after VFS.umountRecursiveLocked() is complete. (Linux does the same thing: fs/namespace.c:do_umount() => lock_mount_hash(), fs/pnode.c:propagate_mount_busy(), umount_tree(), unlock_mount_hash().) - It's not possible for dentry deletion to umount while only holding VFS.mountMu for reading, but it's also very unappealing to hold VFS.mountMu exclusively around e.g. gofer unlink RPCs. Introduce dentry.mu to avoid these problems. This means that VFS.mountMu is never acquired for reading, so change it to a sync.Mutex. PiperOrigin-RevId: 282444343 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
BUILD | ||
benchmark_test.go | ||
directory.go | ||
filesystem.go | ||
memfs.go | ||
named_pipe.go | ||
pipe_test.go | ||
regular_file.go | ||
symlink.go |